Uploaded image for project: 'PUBLIC - Liferay Portal Community Edition'
  1. PUBLIC - Liferay Portal Community Edition
  2. LPS-124037

As a Page Creator I would like to create relationships between items of different types (3)



      A common need across many enterprise solutions is the ability to define and retrieve relationships between items of the same or different types. These relationships can be of several types:

      • Manually determined by a person or automatically generated
      • Static or dynamic (changes over time)
      • Sorted or unsorted
      • Bi-directional or uni-directional
      • Single valued or Multi-valued
      • Single-scope or multi-scope (i.e. link to items in a different scope)

      Some examples of useful relationships that have been found useful when building Liferay applications and solutions are:

      1. Blog Entry -  suggested blog entries: manually picked blog entries that the reader may want to continue with after finishing the current entry. Characteristics: Sorted, Multi-valued.
      2. Blog Entry - entries about the same topic: automatically picked based on the categories or tags of the current entry. Characteristics: Unsorted, Multi-valued.
      3. Product - related web content: manually picked web content that help describe the product. Characteristics: Sorted, multi-valued.
      4. Product - Documents: manually picked documents that a product buyer may want to have access too. Characteristics: Unsorted, multi-valued.
      5. Category - Web Content: which can be used in a Category Display Page
      6. Category - Image Document: which can be used in a Category Display Page

      The goal of this Epic is to provide a set of improvements that allow end users to create relationships as well as display items following the relationships. Solution developers should be able to define custom relationship types.




            support-lep@liferay.com SE Support
            jorge.ferrer Jorge Ferrer
            Recent user:
            Marta Elicegui
            Participants of an Issue:
            0 Vote for this issue
            2 Start watching this issue




                Version Package